Morning, Marco. Unusual day: essentially the whole briefing comes out of one building in Munich. The ESC Congress opened Friday and by last night it had already retired the phrase "type 2 MI," deleted HFmrEF from the vocabulary, told us what a statin actually buys a healthy 78-year-old, and handed you a genuinely hard bedside question about brain bleeds and blood thinners. Three of these change words you write in charts. Read A, skim the debate, then sleep.
A · Top Stories
Trial · Geriatrics
STAREE: atorvastatin cut cardiovascular events 30% in healthy over-70s — and changed nothing about how long they stayed independent
Presented Saturday at ESC and published simultaneously in NEJM, STAREE randomized roughly 5,000 community-dwelling adults over 70 — no known cardiovascular disease, no diabetes, no dementia — to atorvastatin 40 mg or placebo for about six years. Major cardiovascular events fell 30%, driven mainly by nonfatal events. The co-primary endpoint the trial was actually built around, disability-free survival, was unchanged. Muscle, liver, and diabetes-related adverse events were more common on atorvastatin; serious adverse events were balanced. HCPLive · ACC summary
Why it matters to you: this is the first real randomized answer to the question you inherit every night — the 81-year-old on a primary-prevention statin nobody has revisited since 2011, now admitted with weakness and a creatinine of 1.9. STAREE says the drug is doing something (fewer nonfatal MIs and strokes) but does not buy the outcome families actually ask about (more time living independently). That's a much more honest sentence than either "statins don't help old people" or "everyone stays on it."
Action: this is deprescribing language, not a deprescribing mandate. Next time you're holding a statin for myalgias or a transaminase bump in someone over 75 with no CAD, the discharge note can now say what the trade actually is — fewer nonfatal events, no change in disability-free survival — instead of deferring entirely to the PCP.
Definition · Documentation
"Type 2 MI" is gone: the Fifth Universal Definition replaces numbered MI types with primary, secondary, and procedure-related
The ESC, ACC, AHA and World Heart Federation jointly released the Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction on Friday, published in JACC and Circulation. The Types 1–5 numbering introduced in 2012 and expanded in 2018 is retired in favor of three clinical categories: primary (atherothrombotic), secondary (oxygen supply–demand imbalance from another acute condition — what you've been calling type 2), and procedure-related. The document also formalizes sex-specific troponin thresholds, pushes imaging to establish etiology, and comes with dedicated ICD-11 codes. HCPLive · ESC release
Why it matters to you: demand ischemia in an elderly septic or GI-bleeding patient is one of the highest-volume documentation decisions you make, and the reason the societies gave for the change is exactly your complaint — the numbered types were applied inconsistently. "Secondary MI" with the precipitant named is clearer than "type 2 MI" ever was, and the ICD-11 codes mean coding and CDI will eventually be pulling for that phrasing. The sex-specific thresholds are the quieter change: your default troponin cutoff has been doing a woman's rule-in and a man's rule-out with the same number.
Worth raising: ask whoever owns your chest-pain order set and CDI queries when the local troponin reference ranges and MI-type language get updated — this is the kind of change that sits in a journal for eighteen months before anyone touches the EHR.
Guideline · Heart Failure
2026 ESC heart failure guidelines: HFmrEF deleted, "acute HF" becomes "decompensated HF," staging goes A through D
The new ESC HF guideline collapses three ejection-fraction phenotypes back into two: HFrEF is now any LVEF under 50% (absorbing the old 41–49% mildly-reduced band) and HFpEF is LVEF 50% or above. The term "acute heart failure" is replaced by "decompensated heart failure" on the grounds that most of these patients don't decompensate suddenly — function drifts until compensation fails. A four-stage framework (A at-risk, B pre-HF with structural abnormality, C symptomatic, D advanced) now runs alongside the phenotypes. Cardiac rehabilitation and a first joint ESC/ERA cardiovascular-plus-CKD guideline landed the same week. HCPLive · Cardiovascular Business
Why it matters to you: the EF 41–49% patient has been the most annoying admission in your service line — not clearly a quadruple-therapy patient, not clearly a diuresis-and-discharge patient. Europe just resolved the ambiguity in the direction of treating them like HFrEF. US guidelines haven't followed, so for now you'll see both vocabularies in the same chart, and the mismatch will show up in transfers and in cardiology consults trained abroad. The "decompensated" relabel is more than semantics: it reframes the admission as a failure of a slow process, which is the framing that supports asking what changed at home three weeks ago.
Talking point: good agenda item for the next group meeting — which EF bucket your order sets and readmission metrics key off, and whether an EF of 45% currently routes to the HFrEF pathway at your shop.